Announcements If you're new to this blog, then read our guides to the basics: Skin (Part I), Skin (Part II), The Supernatural, Color Theory I, Color Theory II, Eyes, and Brushes. Also, check out the blogsale. Contents Favored Art Tattler the glamourai The Non-Blonde Perfume Shrine Lisa Eldridge Garance Doré Smitten Kitchen Into The Gloss Grain de Musc Lacquerized Res Pulchrae Drivel About Frivol The Selfish Seamstress Killer Colours Bois de Jasmin Glossed In Translation Jak and Jil Toto Kaelo Worship at the House of Blues I Smell Therefore I Am Food Wishes The Natural Haven Messy Wands 1000 Fragrances Moving Image Source Wondegondigo The Emperor's Old Clothes M. Guerlain Colin's Beauty Pages Barney's jewelry department Parfümrien loodie loodie loodie The Straight Dope Sea of Shoes London Makeup Girl Sakecat's Scent Project Asian Models Ratzilla Cosme Smart Skincare Illustrated Obscurity A.V. Club Tom & Lorenzo: Mad Style Eiderdown Press Beauty and the Bullshit La Garçonne Flame Warriors Everyday Beauty Fashion Gone Rogue Now Smell This Dempeaux Fashionista The Cut A Fevered Dictation Nathan Branch 101 Cookbooks |
![]() Jacques-Louis David, The Coronation of Napoleon (1806). People are apt to complain about Chanel No. 5. It's too big, too recognizable, it's kind of the Tracy Lord of scents, caught right between the grand and the grandiose. You'd have to be gauche not to admire No. 5, but secretly you might resent its hard, perfect glamour. It's been a bestseller for 90 years, known in the vernacular as "le monstre". If you read reviews on No. 5, the most salient refrain is that label—"old lady", or "vile old lady", or occasionally a euphemism, "timeless". And, in a way, it's true. No. 5 hardly conjures up the playful vision of Estelle Warren's youthful vivacity or even Carole Bouquet's sultry whisper: "Tu me détestes n'est-ce pas? Dis-le... dis-le que tu me détestes." (Let us not speak of those awful, awful Nicole Kidman advertisements.) But then, perfume is above all aspirational. Most people wouldn't know an aldehyde from a hysterectomy, so in part those miraculous sales depend a great deal on No. 5's reputation: the Chanel name, because Marilyn Monroe wore it to bed, and maybe your mother or grandmother wore it out to parties, No. 5 clinging to her furs. But in spite of its ubiquity, historical iconicity, and cultural status, anyone who expects a mere perfume to catapult them into the heights of glamour, to become one of those girls in the commercials, is liable to be disappointed. Aspiration plays tricks on those who know, too. Ernest Beaux's overdose of aldehydes may have been revolutionary in 1921, but by now there's so much in its wake, you can hardly see No. 5 for all the turbulence. So many perfumes smell of aldehydes, in fact almost all of them do, that fumeheads, who often pride themselves on tacking a course to unknown lands, draw a disappointed blank—they complain it smells too "perfumey", old-fashioned at that. We cannot ignore these prejudices in a discussion of No. 5, but as I sniff at my vintage extrait, I am struck, to put it as simply as possible, by its beauty. What other imperative matters? Its heart is so lush and fine, the parfum features true jasmine de Grasse and rose de Mai (shown at left), from Chanel's own fields in the south of France. The resulting bouquet is well balanced, but the heady, indolic character of jasmine is perhaps more prominent than the salty austerity of rose, because the supporting notes cast a warm glow on the whole: a candied floral top of neroli and violet (the latter, I am guessing, is C12), the tropical humidity of ylang ylang, and a sumptuous vetiver-amber drydown, supplemented by creamy sandalwood and a hint of animalic musk. What makes No. 5 tick, however, is that slug of aldehydes that hits you straight from the bottle, which according to Elena's sagely informative discussion on aldehydes are of a specific kind and quantity. The effect of aldehydes is not unlike that of a bottle of champagne, what Jimmy Stewart calls "Cinderella's slipper" (hic!): the powdery, pearl-like, waxy texture, the volume of its sillage, a scintillation of candlelight gleaming off endless silver. Like other successful ventures, No. 5 has a string of direct imitations—the floral clarity of Jean Patou JOY, the downy softness of Lanvin Arpège, the fantastically warm, woody tones of Caron Nuit de Noël, Guerlain Véga and Liù, orange-tinged and austere, and even Chanel's own flanker, Eau Première, less floral with a high, metallic powderiness—these are all excellent perfumes, but the original stands head and shoulders above them all, the smell of pure, invulnerable charisma. If Napoleon were alive today, and sexism didn't enforce such rigidity of habit, he'd carry off Chanel No. 5 to perfection. I've long resisted Chanel No. 5, because neither a floral bouquet, and certainly not one that features jasmine, nor strong aldehydes really appeal to my personal taste. But while the EDP is hardly a pale rendition, the parfum is revelatory, a glorious skin scent that banishes the trace of harsh, urine-like indoles that mark the EDP. Stylistically, the infamous aldehydes remove No. 5 from the raw, natural beauty of Caron Bellodgia, which smells exactly like a Provençal flower market, but in the parfum at least, the quality of jasmin de Grasse (shown at right) is not the least bit obscured, just abstracted. A dab of Chanel No. 5 transports you into a world free from the taint of cynicism, which, in my view, is the idea behind a floral perfume in the first place, like some magic universe populated by fantastic heels that never, ever hurt, that instant transformation of the ordinary to the regal. Is this an alchemical subterfuge? Most assuredly. Is it also a carefully designed, tightly controlled propaganda machine that uses imagery like Marilyn Monroe or Catherine Deneuve to boost sales? Absolutely. Is it accessible and easy to wear? Surprisingly, no. And not in that elusive, intellectual way of Guerlain Mitsouko, but more akin to a tiara: Chanel No. 5 seduces the inner princess in all of us. OTHER REVIEWS Now Smell This Basenotes Makeupalley Labels: aldehydes, caron, chanel, ernest beaux, guerlain, jacques-louis david, jasmine, jean patou, lanvin, napoleon bonaparte, perfume notes, roger vivier, rose, the philadelphia story 12/28/2008 [2] |
Subscribe to The Mnemonic Sense Most Wanted The Beauty Primer Lookbook Bestsellers Consumer Diaries Closet Confidential On The Label Beauty Notebook The Hit List Color Me In The Makeup Artist Wedding Bells Globe Trotter Desert Island perfume notes beauty notes fashion notes culture notes minimalism chypre arc floral arc fresh arc masculines arc gourmands & orientals arc Archives August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 Images Photobucket |