One of my problems with sequins had been their fairly strict virgin/whore connotations. I've primarily only seen sequins as appliques on holiday sweaters or on overly tight, short, and skimpy frocks. While there's a whole lot of room between for experimentation, it takes thinking outside of these extremes to do so. This can be difficult to do when the extremes are so embedded into the cultural consciousness as to be accepted as "the way it is," so it is little surprise that my conversion to sequins began with a step outside my own norms.
French fashion blogger Betty is the first, and most instrumental, person to show me the way with sequins. I love her use of them because she takes everything that always scared me about sequins - their cheapness, frumpiness, tackiness, and overt, aggressive sexuality - and throws it out the window. She's able to wear them simply as just another design element without any allusions to their sordid past.

I've saved my favorite sequin look for first. What I love about this outfit is that it isn't about sequins at all. Instead, it looks as though Betty has thrown on a sweater that just happens to have sequins on it, sidestepping the issue of obviousness and just looking like herself. It also helps that the sequins aren't in some sort of pattern (the ubiquitous flower or butterfly), but instead have a tonal effect, brightening the darker greys and blues of the outfit. And the fact that they are placed on a small, concentrated area of the sweater doesn't hurt.

Sequins don't have to be relegated to supporting role, though. They can be a centerpiece of an outfit so long as the outfit maintains balance. Betty achieves this both through a voluminous cut and the inclusion of neutral and earthy design elements. This tunic would be far too much if it were tight - too overt, too sexy, too much for daytime. This looser, slouchier cut allows for a softer, more wearable look that's infinitely more flattering to a variety of body types than the standard skin-flick of a sequined dress. The earthy shoes also play down the shine to literally ground the look, and the denim works as a kind of universal neutralizer to keep either of the other two elements from standing out too much or working against each other.

If you really want to subvert the norms, though, just use sequins themselves as a neutral. In the wrong hands, this outfit would become a skimpy tank and shorts with no room for the imagination, but Betty transforms the tank into the outfit's grounding piece. By wearing sequins in a neutral tone and matte finish on a more voluminous cut, Betty's able to take a sequined tank and essentially dress it down to the level of a white t-shirt. All the sequins do here is add texture to what would otherwise be a matte, flat outfit so that the tank is an entirely wearable neutral that can either add balance or pop to an outfit.

Pop - that's what I used to think sequins were all about. I still think they can be, though I now have a different idea of what that means thanks to Zanita. Instead of neutralizing sequins, like Betty, Zanita uses them as a whimsical centerpiece to an otherwise adult outfit. The shoes are attention-getters, for sure, but they're fun and funny rather than pushy and sexy, plus they provide a lovely contrast to the black. I have to admit, I've been looking for sequined skimmers since I first saw this picture.
My other gripe with sequins has been that they look cheap - not only in the sense of gaudy, but also as in poorly applied, about to fall off, and just plain busted. Go to a store and you'll often see them applied in some hideous design, too much (all over a full-length gown), or just randomly sprinkled over netting without any thought or purpose.
As with beading, embroidery, lace, and other handiworks, sequins require real craftmanship of application and aesthetics. This is why so much factory-sewn sequin work looks cheap, gawdy, and tacky. The method of production doesn't allow for time and thoughtfulness in application. When sequins are properly accounted for as a design element, as in the picture below, they can end up looking rich, expensive, and purposeful.

This Lanvin dress works because Albert Elbaz has accounted for the way sequins catch and reflect light. It would be far too much silver, sparkle, and "fabulousness" to fully sequin a dress in bright, metallic silver. The use of matte grey-silver is appropriate - it's eye-catching, and that is where it begins and ends. The dress doesn't grasp for your attention or leave you slave to its sheer gaudiness. Instead, the eye is subtly drawn to it so that the viewer only glances and wants to take it more.
This dress is also stunning because it's very, very expensive. Lanvin is a luxury brand in the truest sense, which means that the brand can afford to spend money on design, development, and labor. This allows Elbaz to spend the time necessary to decide on exact placement of sequins - where they must be laid down to catch light, how they need to be placed to allow for draping of the garment, and so forth. This also allows for spending on quality materials, quality craftmanship, and ironically, failure. If a dress doesn't drape right the first time, Elbaz has a little elbow room to play with and perfect the design, certainly more than a designer scraping by. In turn, all of these elements combined with a truly discerning designer allow for exceptional clothing that will neither look cheap now, nor in 20 years.
My gosh, what beautiful style Betty has. And I so envy her hair.
ReplyDeletei'm still swooning over Jeff Buckley's Grace album cover.
ReplyDeleteBetty also does great subtle makeup. I think she even went to school for it.
ReplyDeleteI love your user name, ellastica! Can't tell you how many times I listened to their album in high school.
hmmm. this is a blog i see mentioned or linked a lot but never really got into. most style blogs in general turn me off. i'm not really all that interested to be honest. altho if Jane Birkin or choreographer Maria Hassabi and the completely under-rated stylist/ journalist Anne Christensen had a style blog I'd definitely change my tune. it seems the most inspiring people with the most impeccable taste and exacting eye don't flaunt it or put it out there, if that makes sense. i guess that's part of their appeal for me.
ReplyDeletei used to have the biggest crush on a girl in high school who looked just like Justine.
awesome blog btw!
Thanks for the lovely compliment! To be honest, I didn't know that we're linked to all that often. I always got the impression we were some kind of underdog compared to the BIG blogs out there.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Ellastica, the people with the best taste put their energy into exercising it, and the people with less discriminating taste put their energy into parroting the originals. I think that's the problem with the majority of style blogs out there. While they do feature styles, or a style, very little of it is truly personal and distinctive from the rest, and in the current cultural climate, I wonder if true originality in style would be celebrated or if it would be shuffled to the side for not being another iteration of whatever's the cool thing of the week. I think it would be a little of column A, a little of column B.
i was referring to betty's blog:O
ReplyDeleteyou're linked now by moi!
here's a great quote by a great director (rule #5):
http://www.moviemaker.com/directing/article/jim_jarmusch_2972/
Oh, I totally misread your comment. I managed to miss a) that you didn't like Betty's blog and b) that you were talking about Betty's blog in the first place. I speed read too much to be a good reader.
ReplyDeleteThose are great quotes. Thanks for sending them. What made you decide to do that?
By the way, I like that you post scans from 90s magazines. There are so many magazines I wish I'd kept from that time, but maybe it's just as well I didn't. Depriving myself of them keeps me from sitting in a corner, obsessively revisiting Kate Moss editorials while rocking and waiting for economic revival to visit us.
my bad. i tend to speed type in a vague manner expecting people to read my mind. hence the quote links relating to your thoughts on style/originality.
ReplyDeletei don't dislike betty's blog ( i've only looked at once or twice) she just doesn't do much for me, but neither do most the personal style blogs out there.
the 90s man that's where it's at for me then and now. maybe it's a rose colored outlook on that time but fashion had heart and soul, more mystique; starting around the age of 5, fashion was my own private world. with all the incessant celeb-designer-brand name dropping(a major pet peeve), diffusion lines, clothes i'd never be caught dead wearing, or random models i don't feel a kinship to, fashion of today is sort of depressing for me.
i open most any issue of 90s Harper's Bazaar and see something that instantly appeals to me, whether it be an actual garmet, page layout, artistic celeb cover(!)/
editorial, exciting beauty concepts or model i'd wanna travel or hang out with; looking through magazine's of today that special something is missing.
yeah, i really do treasure my 90s mags.
it's great to connect with people who remember
these 90s eds and enjoy my scans;)
Harper's Bazaar was def the best magazine in the 90s, even better than Vogue. Liz Tilberis had such a strong editorial voice, and the magazine was much more visually oriented than it is now and certainly moreso than Vogue has ever been, as good as some Vogue eds can be. Now, though, HB is such a soulless magazine. It's 100% commercially driven and I think somehow they've managed to scare their photographers into the most insanely boring drivel they can produce, and I even say that liking Camilla Akrans and Peter Lindburgh. They just don't do interesting stuff for HB anymore.
ReplyDeleteI feel like fashion used to be more exclusive and probably snobby, but a little exclusivity was better. There was a bit more discernment in the collections and in fashion overall. You didn't have 200+ people showing at Fashion Week. There is something soulless to a business that's now so openly, bloatedly all about the money. It's like basketball - people used to play for love of the game.
I don't know if you like Sea of Shoes, but she's one of a handful of truly original style bloggers out there, and she has a link to her very cool Tumblr, as well.
OK, seriously how banal and homogenized has Linbergh's image become since Bailey's reign?
ReplyDeleteI'm totally fine with celeb covers and eds in HB; in fact I used to look forward to them (remember the breathtaking Wino cover?). Use the phenomenal Melanie Ward to style on occasion!!! (I'm not even go to go there with Angelina's recent cover...). Some daring and creativity please. Really that's what the whole mag has been lacking. oh and class.
Sea of shoes what a great name! Yes once in a great while I'll peruse her site. All of her high fashion goodness is a bit overwhelming for me (maybe that's more the layout)! Still am very impressed with her knowledge and love of fashion. A pretty face doesn't hurt either!
great images!
ReplyDeleteThe Lanvin dress is stunning.
I'm rather worried that sequins won't last very many wearings, so I tend to avoid them, but they look so lovely here.