Announcements If you're new to this blog, then read our guides to the basics: Skin (Part I), Skin (Part II), The Supernatural, Color Theory I, Color Theory II, Eyes, and Brushes. Also, check out the blogsale. Contents Favored Art Tattler the glamourai The Non-Blonde Perfume Shrine Lisa Eldridge Garance Doré Smitten Kitchen Into The Gloss Grain de Musc Lacquerized Res Pulchrae Drivel About Frivol The Selfish Seamstress Killer Colours Bois de Jasmin Glossed In Translation Jak and Jil Toto Kaelo Worship at the House of Blues I Smell Therefore I Am Food Wishes The Natural Haven Messy Wands 1000 Fragrances Moving Image Source Wondegondigo The Emperor's Old Clothes M. Guerlain Colin's Beauty Pages Barney's jewelry department Parfümrien loodie loodie loodie The Straight Dope Sea of Shoes London Makeup Girl Sakecat's Scent Project Asian Models Ratzilla Cosme Smart Skincare Illustrated Obscurity A.V. Club Tom & Lorenzo: Mad Style Eiderdown Press Beauty and the Bullshit La Garçonne Flame Warriors Everyday Beauty Fashion Gone Rogue Now Smell This Dempeaux Fashionista The Cut A Fevered Dictation Nathan Branch 101 Cookbooks |
I recently caught a link to this series by Lee Gainer, in which she collected images of engagement rings at various price points, representing two months' salary (or wages) for a variety of occupations. Two months' salary, as you probably know, is the amount a man is "supposed" to spend on an engagement ring, for fear of being thought stingy and unloving. According to Gainer's research, this rule was invented and proclaimed by DeBeers in 1947. It occurs to me that aside from being extravagant, this "rule", if followed, renders engagement rings rather vulgar; it's a well-established rule of etiquette that it's impolite to talk about money in public, and allowing a ring to do the talking for you -- "I'm marrying a man who makes this much!" -- isn't much better. Gainer's statement on the series refers to derogatory comments made about men who buy insufficiently expensive rings -- "he tried his best but it wasn't good enough", "very nice for a friendship ring", that sort of thing. A shame, because I think several of the "cheap" (still not actually cheap) rings here are rather pretty. Of course the entire engagement ring phenomenon is a bit lost on me. My mother didn't have one, I'm pretty sure my grandmothers didn't either, I rarely wear rings, and while I admire individual pieces of diamond jewellery, diamonds in general don't suit my personality (absent-minded), my colouring, my politics or my budget. Gainer is obviously very critical of the engagement ring "tradition". Her reasoning makes sense to me, but I remain a little more agnostic. I have a number of friends who cherish their engagement rings and I would never criticize them for this; even so, I can't say the practice holds much appeal for me. What do you think? Labels: culture notes, lee gainer 4/22/2009 [16] |
Subscribe to The Mnemonic Sense Most Wanted The Beauty Primer Lookbook Bestsellers Consumer Diaries Closet Confidential On The Label Beauty Notebook The Hit List Color Me In The Makeup Artist Wedding Bells Globe Trotter Desert Island perfume notes beauty notes fashion notes culture notes minimalism chypre arc floral arc fresh arc masculines arc gourmands & orientals arc Archives August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 August 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 March 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 June 2013 July 2013 Images Photobucket |